West indies fast bowler Jayden seal After sending an aggressively sent to the Australian captain, a fine of his match fee and 15% of a single demerit point has been given. Pat Cummins During the first day of Barbados test. The incident, which took place in the 55th over in Australia’s first innings, has attracted attention to player conduct and vigilance enforcement of the International Cricket Council (ICC) code of conduct.
Jayden seals violates the ICC’s code of conduct
When Cummins, while trying to accelerate Australia’s scoring, when the Compins was dismissed for a fast 28 delivery, the controversial moment came out, which was caught on mid-off. Soon after taking the wicket, Seal was seen making a different pointing towards the Australian dressing room, an action that was violated by the ICC rules.
The nuances of seal infection belongs to Article 2.5 of the ICC Code of Conduct, which restricts “Use of language, functions or gestures that dislike or who can provoke an aggressive reaction from a batsman on their dismissal during an international match.” Such rules are meant to maintain the spirit of cricket and ensure respectable behavior among the contestants.
Speaking after the day’s game, a contemplative seal offered his vision on the event, reducing any malicious intentions. “I really meant nothing by the response,” He said, clarifying that “It was more disappointed.” That and in detail, “Pat hit me a couple of good shots, and I showed her where the dressing room was, and there was nothing really in it.” Despite their explanation, the match referee proceeded with approval, highlighting the Samhita’s strict interpretation.
This is an important point for the young fast bowler, as it forms their second crime within a 24 -month period. As a result, the seal now accumulates two demeriting points, putting it under investigation closely. The accumulation of further demeriting points can lead to more severe punishment including the match suspension under the ICC’s Demerit Point System.
Bridget Town Test introduced equally amid controversies
Prior to the incident, the seal was enjoying a stunning performance with the ball, eventually completing Australia’s first innings with impressive figures of 5 for 60. His extraordinary bowling attempt played an important role in rejecting Australia for a minor clan of 180. In response, the West Indies ended the first day, which was placed at 57 for 47.
The match continued with further twist and turn, including the on-field controversy. On the second day at the historic Kensington Oval, the West Indies were excluded for 190, leading in the first innings. However, the day was overseen by several controversial decisions made by the TV umpire. Adrian holdstockWhich continued to go against the domestic side. These decisions strongly criticized, especially from the West Indies Coach Daran SammyWho gave voice to his displeasure after his team Reduce Australia by 92/4 in your second inningsEstablish the platform for a stressful conclusion for the Test match.