Legendary Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar Finally, in Manchester, he has talked about the very promoted handshake controversy which surfaced during the fourth test between England and India. The incident, England captain Ben Stokes and Indian all -rounders Ravindra Jadeja and Washington SundarDuring the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, a terrible debate on the spirit of cricket and competitive strategy was ignited, which eventually ended in a 2–2 series draw.
Handshek incident: drama in Manchester
The play began during the closing stages of the fourth test at Old Trafford, Manchester. India is batting completely for a draw with a draw and both Jadeja and Sundar reached hundreds of their personal people, contacting the Indian pair, which suggests a handshake to end the draw match. However, Jadeja politely rejected Stokes’ proposal, as both he and the beautiful were eager to complete their centuries before agreeing to end the match. The decision provoked online debate and opinion from former cricketers, which divides the cricket world on the sports skills of the Act.
Stress was briefly erupted: The two Indians were officially fixed after closing their milestones and officially fixed, Stokes avoided joining the post -ground match. It allegedly left Jadeja, which consists of a frosty exchange of words. The episode became a flash point, which dominated the headlines and was increasing a comprehensive conversation about unwritten codes in cricket.
Tendulkar Back Team India
Speaking through a video posted on Redit, Tendulkar placed his entire weight behind Team India and his attitude towards the situation. ,Washington scored a hundred and Jadeja scored a hundred. Why is it not in the right spirit? They were playing for a draw. Earlier, they dropped it out of when England were going on them and all this was talking to batting brilliantly, ” Tendulkar said under pressure appreciating the flexibility of the Indian pair.
Tendulkar further criticized Stokes’s clear jealousy, emphasizing that it was England’s choice to present a part -time bowler Harry Brook Towards the end, but India’s obligation not to help their main bowlers relax before the next test in England. “This was not the problem of India. For me, it was fine. They were playing for a draw, not for their hundreds. If they went out, India could lose. When they came out to bat, Harry Brook was not bowling, so that was it? So, why should the England bowlers be fresh for the fifth test?” He challenged, questioned the argument behind the desperation of the English captain.
Tendulkar ends the dispute
While this phenomenon added fuel to the already fiery chain, it eventually did not sour the atmosphere after the series. After leveling the series after the fifth test, the players from the two sides came together for a customary afterport, which separated the on-field tension. Reports suggest that the teams exchanged the room and honor, especially on the brave performance from both benches in the fierce summer.
Tendulkar concluded that Team India’s decisions were determined by match conditions, not by individual milestones or disrespect for opponents. “I am completely with the Indian team, whether it is Gambhir or Shubman or Jadeja or Washington, who decided. I am 100 percent with them. In the final Test match, when it was time to speed up, Sundar did it brilliantly, he did not need to capture the crease, where he did it in the fourth Test. Repeated Sachin.