Tension erupted on 3 on the first test day between India and EnglandAs Rishabh Pant found himself at the center of a major dispute after losing his cool on the umpire in Headingley. Rishabh Pant’s routine ball-changing request turned into a fierce moment, which has now put the Indian star at risk of facing action from the International Cricket Council (ICC).
The incident took place during the 61st over of England’s innings at 3 on the day of the five -match Test series opener in Headingley. Mohammad Siraj It was just killed by Harry Brook for a ramp shot, which flew on the slip for four runs.
Rishabh Pants in Hot Water after Hot Exchange with Umpire in Headingley
Just after that shot, Rishabh Pant The ball is believed to have gone out of size. He quickly went to the on-field umpire Paul Refel and asked to change the ball. Paul Refel examined the ball using a standard measuring device called ball gauge.
cricketballgame.com
Also read: Jasprit Bumrah exposes the dirty path of Indian cricket !! He was not spared even the claim
After inspecting it carefully, the on-field umpire ruled that the ball was still in good position and there was no need to change the ball. The pants clearly did not agree with the refail. Disappointed, Pant tried to debate his point and continued to talk to the umpire, but Refel did not change his decision.
When things became hot, everyone shocked. In full view of cameras and crowds, angry pants withdrew the ball into the turf and visible in anger. The works of the Indian vice-captains brought out the crowd in Headingly, and the video quickly went viral on social media.
Rishabh Pant faces possible ICC action
Now, Rishabh Pant’s response can put him in serious trouble. The ICC may consider it a violation of their code of conduct. Showing dissatisfaction for the umpire and handling the ball aggressively are both tasks that can cause penalty or even a match ban.
According to the Code of Conduct of the ICC, the functions of the pants may probably break two specific rules, which both deal with the player’s behavior on the field. The first possible violation is under Article 2.8 of the ICC Code of Conduct. It can be considered either a level 1 or level 2 crime.
Also read: Ravi Shastri brutally Hammer Team India; Set them a target and guarantees the loss when the team fails
Pants functions may be potentially two different articles violated under the ICC Code of Conduct:
Article 2.8: See “showing dissatisfaction in the umpire’s decision”.
Claus (A): “To show clear and extreme disappointment in the umpire’s decision.”
Claus (H): “The decision refers to the prolonged attached discussion with the umpire”.
Article 2.9: The second possible violation is under Article 2.9, which “inappropriate and/or dangerous refers to throwing a ball on or near an umpire.”
Well, the pants did not target the ball at the umpire, but the ball was thrown into the ground just after the decision, it can be seen as abusive and aggressive. Depending on how this article is seen by match officials, this article has punishment under both level 1 and level 2.
Both rules can lead to level 1 or level 2 punishment, including a fine, demeriting points, or, in severe cases, a small suspension.
Also Read: Rishabh Pant Player Profile, Age, Career, Bowling and Batting Statistics
