As India Prepare to bounce back to second test of England Series after the series Heartbreaking disadvantage in HeadingleyFormer cricketer Navjot Singh Sidhu Weighed with his favorite bowling combination. Five-wicket defeat-despite an attempt to bat-reveals India’s bowling shortcomings, which questions about possible changes in XI.
Navjot Singh Sidhu chose India’s bowling combination
Speaking on it YouTube Channel, Sidhu emphasized the importance of diversifying the attack and pitched for it Kuldeep YadavTo include in another test. He said that the left -handed wrist spinner can bring a new dimension to India’s bowling unit. He said that if India decides to rest Jasprit Bumrah Due to the charge management, Arshdeep Singh A parallel drawing should be done with Australia’s strategy.
“For me, it will be Kuldeep with three semens. If you do not want to play Kuldeep because there is a lot of grass, or if Bumrah does not play, bring it to Arshdeep. He will make a khurdarayam for Kuldeep. Stark does so, he makes a thick for Nathan Leone. That’s why he is more than 550.” Sidhu said.
Also read: Gautam Gambhir opened India’s fielding accidents after a headingley defeat against England
Sidhu on ideal batting unit
Exposing the importance of the depth of batting, Sidhu claimed that India should live with seven batsmen. However, if the team management feels that the conditions are not corresponding to Kuldeep, then they should opt for four fast bowlers with an all-rounder instead. Ravindra jadeja,
“India should play seven batsmen. After India’s announcement of playing, I kept quiet, because I knew that his policy was Kuldeep Yadav’s name for the first Test. If Kuldeep was not Kuldeep, if not Kuldeep, you are four seamors. You play batsmen and all-rounders up to seven, but should have four out-and-out boulers with Jadija.” He said.
