Mitchell Starc vs. Jasprit Bumrah after 47 tests: Who is tall among modern motion legends?

Michel Starc And Jasprit Bumrah Two of the most prominent fast bowlers in modern Test cricket are known for their opposite styles and impressive performances.

Fan war climbs over the supremacy between Jaspreet Bumrah and Mitchell Starc

In the growing debate of Bumrah vs. Stark, especially after Bumrah completed 47 tests, a statistical and impact-based comparison burnt social media, especially on platform X, fanfare wars between cricket supporters, bouncing fan wars. While Starc is experienced workheors with over 100 tests and 400+ wickets, Bumrah’s talent, distant dominance and surgical precision in less matches have made it a compelling battle. The real debate is not just about volume, but where and how the wickets came. One has longevity. While others have lethargy.

This is not a debate because it depends on what priority you give.

Is Bumrah a more prominent bowler than Starc? without a doubt. But Stark’s legacy is largely within his long life.

He is doing this for the best part of a decade, in summer after summer. This is special. https://t.co/hly4s6fqgb

– Neel Gardner (@NEALBACKUP) July 15, 2025

Note how Stark is a goat to perform against a tide, Neema, Surf washed winds, while we have to prove Bumrah’s greatness that continuously shows their statistics in the important tournament, tests away and he still calls out that he has no 20 wickets in an innings.

– Udit (@UDIT_BUCH) 16 July, 2025

History will rate Michel Starc higher than Jasprit Bumrah, only because of the ability to workload and manage its sheer stability.

– Tushar Gupta (@Tushar15_) July 15, 2025

Whenever Mitchell Starc performs well, the Joker will never understand the mandatory need of the Joker to draw Bumrah into a debate. Just appreciate a great magic from Australians.

For me, Bumrah will always be miles ahead. He is the greatest bowler who will ever see this generation.

– Anuj Nitin Prabhu (@APTALKSCRICKET) July 15, 2025

Stark, from a left -handed pamen AustraliaTheir express is observed for speed, swinging delivery and ability to generate fierce yorker. He has been a consistent wicket -taking for Australia in a long career, often providing successes with his aggressive approach.

On the other hand, a right -handed fast bowler Bumrah, a right -handed fast bowler, is famous for his unique action, incredible accuracy, subtle seam movement and destructive yorker. He has quickly established himself as a world -class bowler in all formats, especially with his ability to bounce and move out of any surface with his ability to excel in Test cricket. While the Starc brings raw speed and an attacker mentality, Bumrah depends on the exact, control and late movement to batsmen, making both the combined opponents in their rights.

Mitchell Starc or Jasprit Bumrah – Great Paper in Test cricket

1. Performance in Australia: Bumrah’s dominance below under the strength of vs Stark’s house

Mitchell Starc has played 55 Tests out of his 100 Tests at home Australia And on an average of 235 wickets of 26.46, he was assisted by familiar situations. In contrast, the entire 12-testing of Bumrah in Australia has been on foreign soil. Despite this, Bumrah took 64 wickets at a sensational average of 17.15, winning 2 Man of the Match and 1 Man of the Series Awards, all away from home. This comparison keeps in perspective alone how Bumrah thrives in difficult situations. For one, it is his backyard; For the other, this fight is the area, and yet Bumrah has been more impressive.

2. Quality of wickets

One of the most described differences between two pacers is Type They take wickets. Bumrah’s 15 five-dichest halls include only 28.75% telnder wickets (number 8-11), which highlights their habit to remove top-order batsmen-the most valuable dismissal in Test cricket. On the other hand, Stark has 16 five-for for, but a significant 32.55% dismissal has come against a low order. This not only indicates that Bumrah’s mantras are more destructive upfronts, but also show their ability to break the partnership and turn matches in favor of their side.

Also read: The lowest balls to carry 5-cicat in Test cricket feet. Michel Starc

3. Efficiency and Strike Rate (after 47 tests)

The skill in Test cricket is not only about the number of wickets, but how soon and continuously a bowler saves them. After 47 tests, Bumrah delivered 9,150 delivery for 217 wickets, while Stark required 9,845 balls to take 196 wickets. This is an important indicator, Bumrah takes less balls to get more wickets. Their average (19.60) and economy (2.78) also cross Starc (average 27+, economy 3.41) in their careers. Bumrah’s control and tireless accuracy makes him a bowler captain, can depend anywhere else against anyone.

4. Country-wise bowling average

Jasprit Bumrah never played a Test match Pakistan Or in UAESo he has no statistics there. Starc has, and his average in those regions is 42, another indicator that the subcontinent position tests their skills. In contrast, Bumrah has played in army countries (South Africa, England, New Zealand, Australia) and dominates each. Their average (17.19) and South Africa (20.76) in India outlines their ability to extract quite different pitches. Stark, despite his experience, has struggled in India (average 53.66), New Zealand (43.20), and Pakistan/UAE (42). That inequality shows more than the number – it shows Adaptability,

• Comment: Bumrah has not tested Pakistan Or UAE,

5. Match awards in Test cricket

In the context of the recognition of the match, Bumrah stands shoulder to shoulder with Starc despite playing less than half the number of less than half of the tests. Bumrah has 3 Man of the Match and 3 Man of the Series Awards, all MOS Awards are coming away from home, showing how their performance changed the series results. Stark, after 100 tests, there are 4 mothers and 2 moss, both are coming away, but often Bumrah delivers without such a continuous match-shaped dominance.

Head-to-head story shows a lot a lot: Bumrah vs Australia has been a story of dominance -17.15 64 wickets in 12 tests. Meanwhile, Stark took 66 wickets against India during 23 tests – but at an average of 35.84. When it comes to the biggest bilateral competitions, Bumrah has proved more effective and dangerous. He thrives under pressure; Starc has ups and downs.

Final decision: Who is better after 47 tests between Bumrah and Stark?

Starc has been Australian cricket fierce, aggressive and often consistent servants of explosives. But on the 47-testing mark, Bumrah is not only statistically superior, but equally emerges. Statistically more impressiveHe does more with less, less matches, less balls, yet more wickets, better average, tight economy, and more away. Their adaptability in all continents, ability to eliminate top orders, and dominance against the elite increases them in a league of modern great people.

Also read: ENG vs IND: Irfan Pathan questioned Jasprit Bumrah’s workload strategy after Lord’s Test Los