Second day of God test between India and England Saw a controversial moment that instigated the debate between cricket experts and fans equally. IndiaCaptain of Shubman Gill After just 63 delivery, a surprising decision was taken to request the change of the second new ball, a step that former England captain Nasar hussain Described as “bizarre” and “odd”,
Despite this Jasprit BumrahThe destructive magic with the original ball, which saw him taking three quick wickets, the Indian team appeared dissatisfied with the ball position and pushed for a replacement. However, the latter ball change was not in India’s favor, as the replacement ball was older than expected and offered very little support to the bowlers. This incident not only affected the flow of the game, but also raised questions about taking decisions within the Indian camp.
Nasir Hussain’s criticism on a change in the ball shining by India
Hussain was an outspoken criticism of India’s decision to change the ball so soon in the session. He explained that there are usually only two reasons to request a change in the ball: either the umpires do the ball out of size, or the bowling side feels that the ball is no longer effective. However, Hussain reported that the ball in question was exceptionally well performing, with high speed and speed that disturbed the English batsmen.
,This was a very strange ball change from India. There are two reasons that you change a cricket ball. One is that the umpires feel that it has gone out of size, or two, because the bowling attack and the captain realize that the ball is doing nothing and you try and get umpires to change itHussain said on Sky Sports.
Bumrah was in a “magic spell”, who was generating important swing and taking the major wickets, while Mohammad Siraj Was also creating opportunities. Hussain found that Gill became animated and a ball was urged to be clearly working in his favor. He emphasized that Duke Ball is known for its variability, and it was a strategic error for a good ball for a inferior. The replacement ball failed to provide the same level as the aid, allowing England to stabilize and add significant runs.
Full nonsense from Nas. The ball was replaced. It was out of size.
And then the ball changed again as it was again out of shape.
Gabba reading the situation worse than 2002. pic.twitter.com/yxcnnyf8au
– S (@ReVersepaddle) July 11, 2025
See also: Jaspreet Bumrah’s funny answer at Lord’s steals the show after day 2 masterclass
Jaspreet Bumrah’s unpublished on Shubman Gill’s decision
East India wicket-keeper Dinesh karthik Offering a different approach on the dispute, suggesting that Bumrah himself was caught by the guard by requesting ball change. Karthik estimated that the decision was initiated by Siraj and supported by Captain Gill, while Bumrah had already appeared for such a step.
,A little strange, seeing how far the ball was moving, perhaps the most and continuously in this Test match. He gave 63 balls with it and some of them went away. So, I don’t know what the conversation was. it felt like [Mohammed] Siraj started and Shubman was there, Bumrah saw that he was not ready to change it, but it happened, “ Karthik said.
Despite Bumrah’s impressive early magic, sudden change disrupts the rhythm of Indian bowling attack. Karthik described the situation as “a little strange”, given that the original ball was constantly growing. Lack of replacement ball movement gave England batsmen specially allowed Jamie Smith And Bridan CarsTo create an important partnership, which moved the speed to England’s favor. Karthik’s comments highlight the impact of strategic decisions on the player’s readiness during the moments of potential communication intervals and high pressure in testing cricket.
Also read: Top 5 players with the most outfield catch in Test cricket ft.
