England vs India The test chain began with high intensity and drama, and stress did not take long to spread to the area. On the third day of the headingley test, Rishabh PantIndia’s star wicketkeeper-Bater found himself on the wrong side of the law after an emotional response to the umpiring decision.
Rishabh Pant’s animated behavior during England’s first innings
The moment of controversy took place during the 61st over of England’s first innings. Scattered umpiry Paul reflee And Chris Gaffaini To examine any damage of size, a regular inspection of the ball was done using a gauge. While such checks are standard in format cricket for a long time, the umpires decided that the ball does not require replacement.
Pants, resentment with calls, Reacted by throwing ball In visible frustration, on the ground – a task that was considered abusive towards the authorities.
Also read: A elite list of 5 Indian batsmen with a distant twin centuries.
Why the pants have been reprimanded?
The behavior of the pants was classified as a violation of the ICC’s code of conduct, especially under Article 2.8, which relates to the dissatisfaction shown on an umpire’s decision. In a sharp response, the ICC released an official rebuke to the pants. According to a statement issued by the Governing Body, the Indian player accepted the responsibility for his works and agreed to the approval proposed by the match referee Richie Richardson, avoiding the need for a formal hearing.
“Rishabh Pant of India has been given an official reprimand for violation of level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct during the third day of the first test against England in Headingley,” Read the statement.
Disciplinary action includes a demerit point added to the records of pants – his first after his international debut. According to the ICC rules, the offenses of level 1 usually charge a minimum fine, with one or two demerit points from one or two demerit points, ranging from a rebuke to 50% of the match fee.
The allegation was brought forward by the full set-recommendation and Gaffaini (on-field umpire) of the match officials, Sharfudaula ibne Shahid (TV umpire), and Mike Burns (Fourth umpire). His collective observation of the conduct of the pants gave up very little ambiguity in the evaluation.
Also read: Is Rishabh Pant India’s best wicketkeeper-better in Test cricket history? Numbers tell the story
