Chennai Super Kings’ (CSK) Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 The performance was disappointing, resulting in the franchise finishing at the bottom of the points table (10th position) for the first time in its history.
Inconsistent batting and outdated approach by CSK batsmen
CSK’s batting unit suffered from an old and conservative approach, especially in the powerplay, which was their biggest weakness. CSK were known to have the worst powerplay run-rate throughout the tournament, often failing to take advantage of on-field restrictions. The early partnerships were unstable and failed to provide a solid platform, with frequent changes in the starting pairing. In a season where other teams have consistently crossed the 220-run mark, CSK have struggled to show the required high-octane aggression, often getting stuck in the middle overs.
Whereas Shivam Dubey He was the leading run-scorer (357 runs), his strike rate was lower than the previous season, and overall firepower was lacking. Other leading batsmen like Rachin Ravindra And devon conway Seriously poor performance. The failure to adapt to the modern T20 template, which demands fearless hitting from the start, meant that their totals were often below par, putting immense pressure on the bowling unit.
Chennai Super Kings’ bowling problems and wrong steps in the auction
The bowling attack, traditionally CSK’s strength, lacked both strength and consistency, with critics citing missteps in the auction and the failure of experienced players to add to the problem.
The much-awaited spin attack, which usually dominated at their home ground, Chepauk, had become ineffective. marquee spin signings like Ravichandran Ashwin Despite being a star all-rounder, he could take only a few wickets Ravindra Jadeja The season was unusually quiet with both bat and ball. The fast bowlers struggled to complete the spin attack, especially in the death overs, where the team gave a high run rate. Absence of a clear fast bowler and over-reliance on a few individuals such as influential spinners Noor Ahmed (CSK’s leading wicket-taker with 24 wickets) meant the attack was often toothless. The auction strategy, in which the team chose many aging or inconsistent players rather than aggressive young talent, left the team unbalanced and lacking game-changers, resulting in a predictable and easily exploited bowling line-up.
5 important players whom CSK may consider releasing before the IPL 2026 auction:
1. Deepak Hooda

Bought for Rs 1.70 crore in 2025 auction, expectations from the batting all-rounder Deepak Hooda He was required to provide the required stability and firepower in the middle order. However, his campaign was a season of intense conflict. In seven matches, his total runs barely reached the minimum of 31, with a high score of only 22. This lack of output was reflected in his very low average of 6.20 and a sluggish strike rate of 75.61. Hooda’s inability to bring pace or consistency to the innings was a significant contributing factor to the team’s overall poor performance.
2. Sam Curran

left handed allrounder Sam Curran Made a comeback into the CSK setup for Rs 2.4 crore, and his season was a study in contrasts. While he displayed a memorable display of his aggressive batting, he scored the highest score of the season for the team, playing a stormy innings of 88 runs off 47 balls. punjab kings, His contribution with the ball was very limited. In the five matches for which detailed statistics are available, he took only one wicket at an exceptionally high average of 133 and an expensive economy rate of 11.08. Despite his bowling struggles, his aggressive strokeplay earned him a ‘Super Six’ award in a match that highlights one of his rare moments of individual impact.
3.Devon Conway

Conway, New Zealand’s supposedly ‘prolific’ opening batsman, was a colossal failure in this campaign. After being re-signed as a burden for ₹6.25 crore, he was immediately ‘sidelined due to injury’ and gave nothing when the team desperately needed him. He managed only 156 runs in the six matches he was available for, and while there was consistency, his strike rate of 131.09 was extremely slow. His so-called ‘credible foundation’ was completely meaningless, serving only as a rare, disappointing blip of individual performance that did nothing to prevent widespread team unrest and disappointing performances.’
4. Rahul Tripathi

top order batsman, Rahul TripathiHe was a Rs 3.40 crore acquisition whose debut season for CSK failed to ignite. He clearly struggled to convert his usual aggressive intent into meaningful scores. This difficulty was clearly evident in a particularly slow innings against KKR, where he scored 16 runs off 22 balls, an effort rated as one of the slowest innings of the season. His overall initial contribution was minimal, scoring only 46 runs at a strike rate below 100, marking a disappointing and difficult campaign for the new acquisition.
5. Vijay Shankar

all-rounder Vijay Shankar Returned to CSK for Rs 1.2 crore, operated primarily as a middle-order batsman. Their season saw a clear lack of urgency, especially when the team was involved in the run chase. His conservative approach reached rock bottom in a crucial match against Delhi CapitalsWhere he recorded his slowest half-century of the season, taking 43 balls to reach the fifty-run mark. This cautious batting, even in partnership with MS Dhoni, was identified as a contributing factor to the team’s defeat, limiting his positive impact on the crisis-hit CSK campaign.
IPL 2025 Performance Stats (CSK Players)
| player | Matchbox | it goes | highest score | Batting average. | strike rate | Wicket | best bowling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deepak Hooda | 7 | 31 | 22 vs srh | 6.20 | 75.61 | 0 | 0/15 vs gt |
| Sam Curran | 5 | 114 | 88 vs pbks | 22.80 | 135.71 | N/A | N/A |
| devon conway | 6 | 156 | 69 vs pbks | 26.00 | 131.09 | 0 | N/A |
| Rahul Tripathi | 5 | 55 | 23 vs rr | 11.00 | 96.49 | 0 | N/A |
| Vijay Shankar | 6 | 118 | 69 vs dc | 39.33 | 129.67 | 0 | N/A |


