In a step that has ignited an emotional debate, Ritika SajdehIndian cricketer’s wife Rohit SharmaIn Delhi-NCR, stray dogs have strongly opposed a recent Supreme Court directive. His heartfelt and poetic posts on social media have echoed widely, forming the issue not only as a matter of public safety, but also as a crisis of compassion. His comment is contrary to the attitude of civilian authorities and has inspired a comprehensive discussion about finding a balanced and human view for a complex problem.
A heartfelt criticism by Ritika Sajeh of Supreme Court Order of Strey Dogs
Ritika’s social media posts were an emotional and powerful response to the Supreme Court order for civic bodies, to immediately catch and move all stray dogs in shelters. He started his message with a poignant line, “They call it a danger. We call it heartbeat,” To directly challenge the perception of these animals as straight hazards.
She went to portray a vivid picture of stray dogs as an integral parts of urban life, telling them “Silent Night Guard for Shopkeepers” And “When children return from school, the tail is waging.” The purpose of his criticism was what he said to the “elimination” of an entire community of animals, condemning the idea of closing them “Sunlight, freedom, or without familiar face.” This perspective is fast opposite with the views of some officials, such as Delhi’s Mayor Raja Iqbal Singh, who welcomed the court’s verdict, stating that the residents were “fed up with stray dogs” and the order was an essential step for public safety.
Ritika advocated for stray and durable solutions
Accepting legitimate concerns over cutting and public safety, Ritika Sajdeh argued emotionally that the solution was not in imprisonment but in human, long -term strategies. He insisted, “Not punished. Not imprisonment,” And carried forward a clear passage that focuses on permanent animal welfare. Their proposed solutions include implementing large -scale sterilization programs, operating regular vaccination drives, setting up community feeding areas and starting a strong adoption campaign.
Ritika warned that the soul of a society is at risk when she fails to protect her soundless members, says, “A society that cannot protect its soundless is a society losing its soul.” He finished his message with a compelling call to action, urged people to raise their voice for dogs who could not speak for themselves, and ended with ideas-intelligent questions, “Today these are dogs. Tomorrow … who will it be?” This powerful message has been echoing with many people since then highlights deep emotional division in the ongoing public debate.
Also read: Mohammad Azharuddin revealed the recipe behind the success of Mohammad Siraj
Here’s how fans reacted:
Ritika’s post was a hearty criticism of the Supreme Court order for civic bodies in Delhi-NCR to remove stray dogs. He argued that the solution should be human, long -term strategies like sterilization and vaccination, not ‘Elimination Of an entire community of animals. He described stray dogs as familiar and nurtured in daily life, called them one “Heartbeat” Instead of a danger. While his post resonated with many animal lovers and activists, it also criticized those who support the court order for public safety reasons.
Rohit Sharma’s wife Ritika Saje is now crying about stray dogs and has written a good paragraph for her.
He never talked about those who died due to rabies. He never talked about children who were killed by these stray dogs.
He talked about Rafa. But he never spoke … pic.twitter.com/dn6wejm7ou
– incognito (@incnito_qfs) August 12, 2025
These elite people seem so fake men pic.twitter.com/wuomkvb96a
– ((@1921winden) August 12, 2025
Ritika lives in Sajdeh Upscale World. She moves out of her building fores in her luxury car. The number of stress she cope = 0. The matter is cheap. https://t.co/Paj9aw91Z8
– Sannam (@Divya_16_) August 12, 2025
*The Supreme Court decided on stray dogs that to reduce rabies cases significantly*
Varun Dhawan, Janhvi Kapoor, Ritika Saajeh and others to make rabies vaccines: pic.twitter.com/oeqnzs0ixo
– Umdartamker (@umdartamker) August 12, 2025
Ritika is entitled to cursing the Instagram story. Keep the phone away from her FFS. Taking a stand for animals is her personal opinion, but why can’t she do about innocent humans who are being bitten by stray dogs and rice riches? Hypocrisy? A coin has two sides, right?
– Aadvik (@Six_Forty_Eight) August 12, 2025
When I am in the competition of the most useless activity subject and my competition is Ritika Sajdeh pic.twitter.com/ofarzpagua
– Ram Vedi (@ramvedii) August 12, 2025
This makes my headloss when 1%PPL is speaking about mango issues from the 29th floor in Mumbai’s towers. They will never face
“Save the sea, save fish, save stray dogs”. How to save the lives of children who get rabies by stray dogs Ritika? https://t.co/tnona3mjhn
– `(@santhoxsh) August 12, 2025
10000 signatures and Ritika will spend Rs 8 crore on dog shelters instead of their new car. https://t.co/qa1hbjcxiu
– Abhishek Dwivedi (@rezang_la) August 12, 2025
Does people have so low self -esteem and low self image that just one post salutes them?
And it is not even a contradictory stand or something that will endanger their lives. Where is the risk? https://t.co/DQZ72SCP57– Ratna of Viragu (@brawling_virgo) August 12, 2025
Ritika Sajdeh’s opinion on public inconvenience is as irrelevant as Rakhi Sawant’s morality.
She lives in reverse posh bungalows, her husband eats as beef Brahmins and she/her husband never steps on the streets where stray dogs are a threat. So keep it cool https://t.co/z3pwv1wi5n
– Light – ప్రకాష్ – Pranauth (@sareddy95) August 12, 2025
Also read: Gulbadin Naib named his all-time India-Afghanistan XI, which leaves MS Dhoni and Rohit Sharma
